Euler's Totient Function
Before presenting
Euler's theorem, we need to introduce an important quantity in number theory,
referred to as Euler's totient function and written f(n), defined as the number of
positive integers less than n and relatively
prime to n. By convention, f(1) = 1.
Determine f(37) and f(35).
Because 37 is prime, all of the positive integers from 1
through 36 are relatively prime to 37. Thus f(37) =
36.
To determine f(35), we list all of the
positive integers less than 35 that are relatively prime to it:
1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 18,
19, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 29, 31, 32, 33, 34.
There are 24 numbers on the list, so f(35) = 24.
|
Table 8.2 lists the
first 30 values of f(n).
The value f(1) is without meaning but is defined to
have the value 1.
n
|
f(n)
|
---|---|
1
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
5
|
4
|
6
|
2
|
7
|
6
|
8
|
4
|
9
|
6
|
10
|
4
|
11
|
10
|
12
|
4
|
13
|
12
|
14
|
6
|
15
|
8
|
16
|
8
|
17
|
16
|
18
|
6
|
19
|
18
|
20
|
8
|
21
|
12
|
22
|
10
|
23
|
22
|
24
|
8
|
25
|
20
|
26
|
12
|
27
|
18
|
28
|
12
|
29
|
28
|
30
|
8
|
It should be clear that for a prime number p,
f(p) =
p 1
Now suppose that we have two prime numbers p and q, with p q. Then we can show that for n = pq,
f(n) =
f(pq) = f(p) x f(q) = (p 1) x (q x 1)
To see that f(n) = f(p) x f(q), consider that the set of positive integers less
that n is the set {1,..., (pq 1)}. The integers in this set that are not
relatively prime to n are the set {p,2 p,..., (q 1)p} and the set
{q,2q,..., (p 1)q}
Accordingly,
f(n) =
(pq 1) [(q 1) +
(p 1)]
= pq (p + q) + 1
= (p 1) x (q 1)
= f(p)
x f(q)
f(21) = f(3)
x f(7) = (3 1) x (7 1) = 2 x 6 = 12
|
where the 12 integers are
{1,2,4,5,8,10,11,13,16,17,19,20}
|
Euler's Theorem
Euler's theorem states that for every a and n that are
relatively prime:
a = 3; n = 10; f(10) = 4
|
af(n) = 34 =
81 1(mod 10) = 1 (mod n)
|
a = 2; n = 11; f(11) = 10
|
af(n) = 210 =
1024 1(mod 11) = 1 (mod n)
|
Proof: Equation (8.4) is true if n
is prime, because in that case f(n) = (n 1) and Fermat's
theorem holds. However, it also holds for any integer n. Recall that f(n) is the number of positive integers less than n that are relatively prime to n. Consider the set of such integers, labeled as
follows:
R {x1, x2,..., xf(n)}
That is, each element xi of R is a
unique positive integer less than n with
gcd(xi, n) = 1. Now multiply each element by a, modulo n:
S = {(ax1 mod n),
(ax2 mod n),..., (axf(n) mod n)}
The set S is a permutation of
R, by the following line of reasoning:
-
Because a is relatively prime to n and xi is relatively prime to n, axi must also be relatively prime to n. Thus, all the members of S are integers that are less than n and that are relatively prime to n.
-
Therefore,
This is the same line of reasoning applied to the proof of
Fermat's theorem. As is the case for Fermat's theorem, an alternative form of
the theorem is also useful:
Again, similar to the case with Fermat's theorem, the first
form of Euler's theorem [Equation (8.4)]
requires that a be relatively prime to n, but this form does not.
No comments:
Post a Comment