Other Early Stations--The Meter - 4
[14] By reason of the experience gained at this station through the use of these crude
plug-switches, Mr. Edison started a competition among a few of his assistants to devise
something better. The result was the invention of a "breakdown" switch by Mr. W. S.
Andrews, which was accepted by Mr. Edison as the best of the devices suggested, and
was developed and used for a great many years afterward.
Supplementing the story of Mr. Andrews is that of Lieut. F. J. Sprague, who also gives a
curious glimpse of the glorious uncertainties and vicissitudes of that formative period.
Mr. Sprague served on the jury at the Crystal Palace Exhibition with Darwin's son-- the
present Sir Horace--and after the tests were ended left the Navy and entered Edison's
service at the suggestion of Mr. E. H. Johnson, who was Edison's shrewd recruiting
sergeant in those days: "I resigned sooner than Johnson expected, and he had me on his
hands. Meanwhile he had called upon me to make a report of the three-wire system,
known in England as the Hopkinson, both Dr. John Hopkinson and Mr. Edison being
independent inventors at practically the same time. I reported on that, left London, and
landed in New York on the day of the opening of the Brooklyn Bridge in 1883--May 24--
with a year's leave of absence.
"I reported at the office of Mr. Edison on Fifth Avenue and told him I had seen Johnson.
He looked me over and said: `What did he promise you?' I replied: `Twenty-five hundred
dollars a year.' He did not say much, but looked it. About that time Mr. Andrews and I
came together. On July 2d of that year we were ordered to Sunbury, and to be ready to
start the station on the fourth. The electrical work had to be done in forty-eight hours!
Having travelled around the world, I had cultivated an indifference to any special
difficulties of that kind. Mr. Andrews and I worked in collaboration until the night of the
third. I think he was perhaps more appreciative than I was of the discipline of the Edison
Construction Department, and thought it would be well for us to wait until the morning of
the fourth before we started up. I said we were sent over to get going, and insisted on
starting up on the night of the third. We had an Armington & Sims engine with sight-feed
oiler. I had never seen one, and did not know how it worked, with the result that we soon
burned up the babbitt metal in the bearings and spent a good part of the night getting
them in order. The next day Mr. Edison, Mr. Insull, and the chief engineer of the
construction department appeared on the scene and wanted to know what had happened.
They found an engine somewhat loose in the bearings, and there followed remarks which
would not look well in print. Andrews skipped from under; he obeyed orders; I did not.
But the plant ran, and it was the first three-wire station in this country."
Seen from yet another angle, the worries of this early work were not merely those of the
men on the "firing line." Mr. Insull, in speaking of this period, says: "When it was found
difficult to push the central- station business owing to the lack of confidence in its
financial success, Edison decided to go into the business of promoting and constructing
central-station plants, and he formed what was known as the Thomas A. Edison
Construction Department, which he put me in charge of. The organization was crude, the
steam-engineering talent poor, and owing to the impossibility of getting any considerable
capital subscribed, the plants were put in as cheaply as possible. I believe that this
construction department was unkindly named the `Destruction Department.' It served its
purpose; never made any money; and I had the unpleasant task of presiding at its
obsequies."
On July 4th the Sunbury plant was put into commercial operation by Edison, and he
remained a week studying its conditions and watching for any unforeseen difficulty that
might arise. Nothing happened, however, to interfere with the successful running of the
station, and for twenty years thereafter the same two dynamos continued to furnish light
in Sunbury. They were later used as reserve machines, and finally, with the engine,
retired from service as part of the "Collection of Edisonia"; but they remain in practically
as good condition as when installed in 1883.
Sunbury was also provided with the first electro- chemical meters used in the United
States outside New York City, so that it served also to accentuate electrical practice in a
most vital respect--namely, the measurement of the electrical energy supplied to
customers. At this time and long after, all arc lighting was done on a "flat rate" basis. The
arc lamp installed outside a customer's premises, or in a circuit for public street lighting,
burned so many hours nightly, so many nights in the month; and was paid for at that rate,
subject to rebate for hours when the lamp might be out through accident. The early arc
lamps were rated to require 9 to 10 amperes of current, at 45 volts pressure each,
receiving which they were estimated to give 2000 c.p., which was arrived at by adding
together the light found at four different positions, so that in reality the actual light was
about 500 c.p. Few of these data were ever actually used, however; and it was all more or
less a matter of guesswork, although the central-station manager, aiming to give good
service, would naturally see that the dynamos were so operated as to maintain as steadily
as possible the normal potential and current. The same loose methods applied to the early
attempts to use electric motors on arc-lighting circuits, and contracts were made based on
the size of the motor, the width of the connecting belt, or the amount of power the
customer thought he used-- never on the measurement of the electrical energy furnished
him.
No comments:
Post a Comment