That is not to say we must have numerical superiority on every
occasion. In certain circumstances, we may go into battle with a relatively or
absolutely inferior force. Take the case of going into battle with a relatively
inferior force when we have only a rather small Red Army force in a certain
area (it is not that we have more troops and have not concentrated them). Then,
in order to smash the attack of the stronger enemy in conditions where popular
support, terrain and weather are greatly in our favour, it is of course
necessary to concentrate the main part of our Red Army force for a surprise
attack on a segment of one flank of the enemy while containing his centre and
his other flank with guerrillas or small detachments, and in this way victory
can be won. In our surprise attack on this segment of the enemy flank, the
principle of using a superior force against an inferior force, of using the
many to defeat the few, still applies. The same principle also applies when we
go into battle with an absolutely inferior force, for example, when a guerrilla
force makes a surprise attack on a large White army force, but is attacking
only a small part of it.
As for the argument that the concentration of a large force for
action in a single battle area is subject to the limitations of terrain, roads,
supplies and billeting facilities, it should be evaluated according to the
circumstances. There is a difference in the degree to which these limitations
affect the Red Army and the White army, as the Red Army can stand greater
hardships than the White army.
We use the few to defeat the many--this we say to the rulers of
China as a whole. We use the many to defeat the few--this we say to each separate
enemy force on the battlefield. That is no longer a secret, and in general the
enemy is by now well acquainted with our way. However, he can neither prevent
our victories nor avoid his own losses, because he does not know when and where
we shall act. This we keep secret. The Red Army generally operates by surprise
attacks.
No comments:
Post a Comment