Not only does the whole process of the movement of opposites in
the development of a thing, both in their interconnections and in each of the
aspects, have particular features to which we must give
attention, but each stage in the process has its particular features to which
we must give attention too.
The fundamental contradiction in the process of development of a
thing and the essence of the process determined by this fundamental
contradiction will not disappear until the process is completed; but in a
lengthy process the conditions usually differ at each stage. The reason is
that, although the nature of the fundamental contradiction in the process of
development of a thing and the essence of the process remain unchanged, the
fundamental contradiction becomes more and more intensified as it passes from
one stage to another in the lengthy process. In addition, among the numerous
major and minor contradictions which are determined or influenced by the
fundamental contradiction, some become intensified, some are temporarily or
partially resolved or mitigated, and some new ones emerge; hence the process is
marked by stages. If people do not pay attention to the stages in the process
of development of a thing, they cannot deal with its contradictions properly.
For instance, when the capitalism of the era of free competition
developed into imperialism, there was no change in the class nature of the two
classes in fundamental contradiction, namely, the proletariat and the
bourgeoisie, or in the capitalist essence of society; however, the
contradiction between these two classes became intensified, the contradiction
between monopoly and non-monopoly capital emerged, the contradiction between
the colonial powers and the colonies became intensified, the contradiction
among the capitalist countries resulting from their uneven development
manifested itself with particular sharpness, and thus there arose the special
stage of capitalism, the stage of imperialism. Leninism is the Marxism of the
era of imperialism and proletarian revolution precisely because Lenin and
Stalin have correctly explained these contradictions and correctly formulated
the theory and tactics of the proletarian revolution for their resolution.
Take the process of China's bourgeois-democratic revolution, which
began with the Revolution of 1911; it, too, has several distinct stages. In
particular, the revolution in its period of bourgeois leadership and the
revolution in its period of proletarian leadership represent two vastly
different historical stages. In other words, proletarian leadership has
fundamentally changed the whole face of the revolution, has brought about a new
alignment of classes, given rise to a tremendous upsurge in the peasant
revolution, imparted thoroughness to the revolution against imperialism and
feudalism, created the possibility of the transition from the democratic
revolution to the socialist revolution, and so on. None of these was possible
in the period when the revolution was under bourgeois leadership. Although no
change has taken place in the nature of the fundamental contradiction in the
process as a whole, i.e., in the anti-imperialist, anti-
feudal, democratic-revolutionary nature of the process (the opposite of which
is its semi-colonial and semi-feudal nature), nonetheless this process has
passed through several stages of development in the course of more than twenty
years; during this time many great events have taken place-- the failure of the
Revolution of 1911 and the establishment of the regime of the Northern
warlords, the formation of the first national united front and the revolution
of 1924-27, the break-up of the united front and the desertion of the
bourgeoisie to the side of the counterrevolution, the wars among the new
warlords, the Agrarian Revolutionary War, the establishment of the second
national united front and the War of Resistance Against Japan. These stages are
marked by particular features such as the intensification of certain
contradictions (e.g., the Agrarian Revolutionary War and the
Japanese invasion of the four northeastern provinces), the partial or temporary
resolution of other contradictions (e.g., the destruction of
the Northern warlords and our confiscation of the land of the landlords), and
the emergence of yet other contradictions (e.g., the conflicts
among the new warlords, and the landlords' recapture of the land after the loss
of our revolutionary base areas in the south).
In studying the particularities of the contradictions at each
stage in the process of development of a thing, we must not only observe them
in their interconnections or their totality, we must also examine the two aspects
of each contradiction.
No comments:
Post a Comment